95%
developer retention rate
40+
product teams scaled across the U.S. & LATAM
5–10
days from request to kickoff
Trusted by FinTech innovators across the U.S. and LATAM
Hire by Expertise
Services
Hire by Location
Results that Drive Growth for Fintech
FinTech founders and CTOs work with Trio’s engineers for one reason: confidence.
Seamless Scaling
Trio matched Cosomos with skilled engineers who seamlessly integrated into the project.
Expanding Talent Pool
Our access to the global talent pool ensured that Poloniex’s development needs were met.
Senior Engineers Only
Low churn, high continuity
Timezone-aligned collaboration
FinTech-Native Experience
Internal Hiring
Marketplace
The level of quality that Trio brings to our team is unmatched. We’ve worked with lots of different technology vendors, and no one else has been able to provide the same quality of work, while also working within our startup budget, that Trio has.
Brianna Socci
Co-Founder & COO of UBERDOC
Trio understands modern engineering which allows them to find high-quality individuals seeking opportunities to challenge themselves and develop new skills. Their engineers have the highest potential and have surpassed our expectations when taking the chance on them.
Brandon Chinn
Sr. Director of Product Engineering @ Tally
Trio is able to match us with the exact front-end and back-end developers we need. There’s never been something we wanted that Trio wasn’t able to deliver via their team. Their communication is excellent. They’re prompt, clear, and highly available.
Meridith Harold
Founder & CEO of The Informed SLP
How we work together
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Contents
Share this article
Curated by
Expertise
Open banking developers build the consent, security, connectivity, and data infrastructure that makes financial data portability work in production.
The role requires a unique set of capabilities that general API engineers typically lack, like consent lifecycle state machine management, FAPI 2.0 security profile implementation (mTLS, signed request objects, PAR), defensive bank connectivity engineering for fragmented API implementations, and transaction data normalization across multi-bank sources.
The largest US banks had to expose consumer data APIs under CFPB Section 1033 by April 2026. At the same time, the EU is moving from PSD2 toward PSD3, creating additional regulatory complexity in the open banking field.
The engineers who can help you meet these engineering deadlines, but also ensure your long-term success, are not general API integration developers.
You need someone who can work at the intersection of regulatory compliance, financial security standards that go well beyond standard OAuth 2.0, and the messy reality of hundreds of banks each implementing the same specification differently.
Let’s go over what separates qualified open banking engineers from skilled API generalists, how to vet the difference, and how to staff the role.
If you are ready to hire pre-vetted developers through Trio, request talent!
A general API integration engineer connects a product to a third-party API, handles auth tokens, parses responses, and moves on.
An open banking developer needs to have all of these skills, and then also needs to build the infrastructure that keeps that connection legally valid and operationally reliable.
These additional roles include managing consent lifetimes, handling bank-specific re-authentication flows, monitoring per-bank API health, normalizing transaction data from dozens of different response schemas, and maintaining compliance with data storage, purpose limitation, and consent revocation obligations.
Within open banking, two distinct engineering roles exist.
TPP-side engineers work at fintechs consuming bank data to build lending income verification, personal finance management, payments, or cash-flow analytics products. ASPSP-side engineers work at banks building the open banking APIs that Section 1033, PSD2, and CDR require them to expose.
From what we have seen, most fintech teams need TPP-side engineers. US banks facing the Section 1033 deadline need the ASPSP side. Both roles share the same core engineering challenges. They are just applied from different positions.
Related Reading: What Does a Backend Developer Do?
Let’s take a deeper look at the engineering problems that matter, and how open banking developers play an essential role in solving them.
Open banking consent tracks defined states with legally required transitions like initiated, authorized, active, re-authentication pending, expired, and revoked, with account-level granularity for partial revocations.
Under PSD2 and UK Open Banking, consent requires re-authentication every 90 days, and platforms fire PENDING_EXPIRATION webhooks before it lapses.
If you fall anywhere near a field that could be subject to those regulations, your application must handle these events, prompt re-authentication, and degrade gracefully during the re-authentication window.
Revocation carries incredibly high legal stakes.
Under Section 1033, if a user revokes their permissions, third parties need to stop collecting covered data and delete previously collected data, producing audit evidence that deletion occurred.
A general API engineer implements a refresh token. An open banking engineer designs the consent state machine, the webhook processing pipeline, the re-authentication UX flow, and the deletion pipeline.
Over 200 banks each implement the same Berlin Group NextGenPSD2 specification differently.
Some return standard HTTP error codes, others return 200 OK with an error nested in the response body.
SCA redirect behaviors vary, too. Token expiry conventions and rate limits differ across institutions.
Building reliable connectivity requires defensive design from the start. In our experience, this usually involves things like per-bank adapter objects, bank-specific error parsers, retry logic distinguishing transient from permanent failures, per-bank health monitoring, and circuit breakers that trip when error rates exceed a threshold.
Engineers who have only worked with clean REST APIs like Stripe or Twilio build clients that handle the happy path and fail opaquely elsewhere.
On the other hand, engineers who have connected to real bank APIs design for the unhappy path from day one.
FAPI (Financial-grade API) security profiles add requirements that standard OAuth 2.0 implementations don’t meet.
FAPI 1.0 Advanced mandates mutual TLS client authentication using certificates rather than client_secret, signed authorization request objects packaged as a signed JWT to prevent parameter tampering, pushed authorization requests for server-to-server initiation, and sender-constrained tokens bound to the requesting certificate so a stolen token can’t be replayed from a different client.
An engineer who knows standard OAuth 2.0 will build an open banking integration that passes sandbox testing.
But unfortunately, we have witnessed time and time again how these tend to fail in production when the bank requires mTLS certificates or creates exploitable security gaps by not implementing token binding.
FAPI 2.0, adopted under PSD3 and newer CDR iterations, makes PAR mandatory and removes implicit flows entirely.
Raw transaction data is often deeply inconsistent across banks. Transaction descriptions, amount sign conventions, timezone formats, and merchant category taxonomies can all diverge.
The simplest example of this is how some banks return debit amounts as positive values, while others return them as negative.
For any product aggregating data from multiple banks, raw bank data is unusable without a normalization layer that standardizes amount signs, resolves merchant names to canonical identities, assigns consistent categories, and produces a unified transaction schema regardless of source.
For a lending platform running cash-flow analysis for credit decisions, the quality of this normalization layer directly determines whether the product’s risk model works.
Using incorrectly signed debit amounts in a credit model is a risk management failure, not just a display bug.
Engineers with production experience in consent lifecycle management, FAPI security, bank connectivity, and data normalization are naturally going to be more expensive than general API integration engineers.
The combination of regulatory knowledge, security expertise covering mTLS and eIDAS, and practical experience debugging real bank API edge cases is genuinely scarce.
Combined with the fact that large institutions use these developers and offer incredible compensation, be prepared to pay more than typical development positions.
Here is a table covering the basic ranges that we have noticed in the industry:
|
Role |
Base Salary Range |
Fully Loaded Annual Cost |
|
Mid-level Open Banking Engineer (3–5 yrs) |
$130,000–$165,000 |
$175,000–$220,000 |
|
Senior Open Banking Engineer (5–8 yrs, multi-market) |
$155,000–$200,000 |
$210,000–$270,000 |
|
Open Banking Architect (multi-standard, ASPSP + TPP) |
$180,000–$240,000 |
$245,000–$320,000 |
On top of this, you need to think about how the average US time-to-hire for a senior open banking engineer runs 4-6 months, because the role surfaces in general integration engineer candidate pools where most candidates have used aggregator APIs but haven’t implemented FAPI security or direct bank connectivity, increasing the size of the pool you need to sift through.
Hiring through Trio, where we offer a LATAM nearshore model, pre-vetted open banking engineers are placed at $40-$90/hr. And, since we already have pre-vetted developers on our payroll, they can be placed in 3-5 days.
Related Reading: Fintech Recruitment Reshape: Strategies to Win Talent
Hiring open-banking developers is essential if you want your integrations to be able to handle production-level challenges and regulatory pressures.
These developers require a very unique skillset, though, which drives up the price. Fortunately, hiring developers from LATAM through a firm like Trio allows you to minimize costs without sacrificing quality.
Book a discovery call!
US market base salaries run $155,000-$200,000 for senior open banking engineers with production multi-market experience, with fully loaded annual costs of $210,000-$270,000 and typical search timelines of 4-6 months. If you hire through a LATAM nearshore model, like the kind offered through Trio, you pre-vetted engineers at $40-$90 per hour, placed within 3-5 days.
An ASPSP is the bank building open banking APIs that third parties access, while a TPP is the fintech consuming those APIs to build products. ASPSP-side engineering involves building a secure, standards-compliant API that passes regulatory certification. TPP-side engineering involves consuming bank APIs reliably across many institutions, managing consent at scale, and normalizing the resulting data.
FAPI adds mandatory security requirements that OAuth 2.0 doesn’t include, like mutual TLS for client authentication instead of client_secret, signed authorization request objects to prevent parameter tampering, pushed authorization requests for server-to-server initiation, and sender-constrained tokens bound to the requesting certificate so a stolen token can’t be replayed.
An open banking developer builds the consent, security, connectivity, and data infrastructure that makes financial data portability work in production.
Let’s Build Tomorrow’s FinTech, Today.
Whether you’re scaling your platform or launching something new, we’ll help you move fast, and build right.